In February 2011, Google’s DoubleClick ad exchange did a Real-Time Display Advertising  State of the Industry Survey with Digiday, which found that advertisers and agencies are reporting that they will spend more on digital advertising in 2011 because of the benefits of real-time bid (RTB) inventory acquisition technologies.  To help buyers achieve the benefits they expect from RTB, Google published a new whitepaper that shares their view of real-time bidding for online display advertising.  Based on research and primary interviews with Google’s RTB experts across our product, sales and services organizations, this survey provides a clear definition of what real-time bidding is and how buyers can get involved with it.  Readers will find LucidMedia identified by Google at the forefront of this new technology in the free whitepaper here (PDF).

After almost a year of effort, Epic completes final phase of migrating company to new multichannel ad-serving Platform, and decommissions its legacy ad server.

Epic Marketplace (www.epicmarketplace.com), one of the world’s leading integrated multichannel digital marketing solutions providers leveraging the social media, mobile, display, and video channels, announced today the completion of its migration to a comprehensive new cross-channel ad serving Platform. The new Platform provides for a seamless integration between all of Epic Marketplace’s distribution channels, and the ability to acquire inventory on either a real-time bidding (RTB) or direct basis, all with a universal frequency cap. An enhanced attribution analytics engine is a key component of the new Platform.

The new Platform represents a substantial transformation of the Epic Marketplace ad serving paradigm. Among the changes, the company has decommissioned its segment verification program, which was a component of its legacy ad server. The new Platform was architected and built with an enhanced suite of consumer privacy protections, positioning the company to further enhance its world-class status as a leader in digital marketing consumer protection best practices.

The new Epic Marketplace Platform is driven by a proprietary Optimization Engine (OE) that is built around advanced polynomial statistical analysis. The OE, as the “brain” of the new platform, is data-type agnostic and analyzes data input on a non-PII basis from multiple sources – e.g., social media data, cookie data, mobile data – and then renders targeting solutions applicable across all of Epic’s distribution channels. Among the critical targeting solution sets are strong core competencies in audience aggregation, keyword bidding and contextual analytics, the latter via a real time semantic contextual engine.

“This new Platform is a culmination of a vision we set forth several years ago,” said Don Mathis, President and CEO of Epic Marketplace. “With its launch, we are fully positioned for the next five years of growth in our sector – which will be all about the integrated campaign and the opportunity to provide our clients with cross-channel digital marketing solutions, not just a stand-alone display media buy or a social fan campaign, for example. With the new Platform, we can help clients achieve their marketing objectives across the critical digital traffic channels and throughout the marketing funnel.”
Epic Marketplace has strongly leveraged its deep partnership with LucidMedia in the development of certain components of the new Platform’s infrastructure. In particular, the new Platform utilizes key components of LucidMedia’s comprehensive demand-side, real-time bidding (RTB) management platform and its patented semantic contextual targeting engine as integral pieces of the infrastructure of the new Platform.

Through the new Platform, Epic Marketplace is confident that it will provide even greater value for its clients. The company’s enhanced capabilities will allow it to scale campaigns with a universal frequency cap and in a fully integrated approach across social, mobile, display and video, across its own network of premium inventory, and across major exchanges and supply-side platforms such as AdMeld, PubMatic and Rubicon.

“We’re very pleased that after such a long process, this important work for Epic Marketplace has been completed so effectively – and on-time,” said Mathis. “Our new Platform solidifies our market leadership position and allows us to leverage data and enhanced statistical targeting across all critical digital marketing channels. Moreover, the new Platform has been built with an enhanced suite of consumer privacy protections, further ensuring our compliance leadership position as well.”

For more information on Epic Marketplace, please log onto http://www.epicmarketplace.com.

Reprinted from ADOTAS – Many moons ago, when the demand-side platform (DSP) was new and Invite Media was independent, I made some public predictions about display advertising. In the past year, LucidMedia has been executing diligently and dealing with the many twists and turns of our business. I thought it would be fun to revisit those predictions and rate them with 20/20 hindsight.

Before I get into the scoring, let me first review a few of the major industry developments since my predictions:

• Consolidation. The Invite Media acquisition was sadly not followed by a string of other overpriced DSP deals. This disappointed a number of bankers and all the DSPs.
• Self-Service DSP. This became a hot commodity briefly. There was plenty of chatter about “trading” similar to a stock exchange environment. Many media planners of old surely cast themselves as the new “mad men” of media.

We all know now that this is just silly. Soon, everyone realized that a slim markup on media is viable only if you have massive scale. The real value is provided by driving outcomes – i.e., layering valuable optimization services on top of the platform.

Data Management Platforms (DMPs). Data drives performance right?  So the reasoning goes like this – if we could value data appropriately, then publishers can be compensated properly for the “true” value of their audience, instead of getting diluted in an ocean of inventory. And so DMPs became the next hot thing for while.  BlueKai and Exelate raised even more money.

Are they still hot? Did the revenues follow? Anyone care to comment on this?  The established data players like Axciom kicked a lot of tires and eventually picked partners or charted their own path.

RTB Changed Supply Dynamics. Massive scale is now available via RTB on exchanges and supply side optimizers (SSP). These are new sales channels for publishers. These channels were and continue to induce bouts of teeth-gnashing and sackcloth-wearing for publishers as they try to figure out how to leverage them without diluting their value.

On the other hand, the traditional ad network has to deal with a new challenge to maintain their captive publisher base. As their publisher based flirted with SSPs and exchanges, networks saw no other option but to take a seat on the exchanges.  They built or partnered to acquire this ability to buy on exchanges. (Congratulations AppNexus – you read this trend well!)

Against that backdrop I thought it would be fun to revisit some of my predictions and throw some bouquets and brickbats at myself. I’ll score them on a scale of 1 to 5 where 1 = “Crack Pipe” and 5 = “Savant.” Just for fun, you may want to revisit your own predictions from last year and score them as well. I will have a glass of wine for all the savants. The crack addicts can join me for a pub crawl.

Prediction #1: Agencies won’t be able to absorb true self-service.

The Thesis: Running display campaigns requires a lot of expertise.  No self-serve DSP provides all of this expertise in a usable fashion for the typical media buyer. It will require human expertise to deliver the outcomes. Agencies do not have this talent and won’t be able to attract this talent.

How it played out: Almost all of the smaller agencies run campaigns with DSPs in “managed service” mode. The DSP typically gets a CPM rate.  Some of the larger holding companies have made significant investments in people to build up internal expertise.

They still use a third-party platform. They still profess independence from any one vendor. And they continue to use up business development cycles in “evaluations” of other DSPs. The media planning groups within these holding companies use the services of the “trading desks” services grudgingly, and continue to RFP externally.

The Score: 3.5. It is too early to call the trading desk experiment a success or a failure.  I would say my prediction is mixed for big agencies, and right on for small agencies!

Prediction #2: The DSP is the next ad network

The Thesis: Building on the predictions that (a) SaaS for agencies will not work out and (b) the change in supply-side dynamics due to exchanges will profoundly impact networks; true value will continue to be delivered by driving desired outcomes for customers. In other words, you make more money by running campaigns well.

This is what an ad network does. (I use the words “ad network” as a placeholder for a marketing services company that runs mainly display campaigns.) If DSPs have to  run campaigns to survive, and networks need the technology of DSP to continue to be relevant, then surely they are one and the same?

How it played out: Lets compare business models.

Demand-Side Platform

• Offers a “managed service” to run campaigns
• May offer a self service backed by managed service
• Pricing is typically CPM, CPC, or CPA
• Client base – agencies and direct advertisers
• Lots of noise about their awesome technology!

“Traditional” ad networks

• The run campaigns – i.e.  – offer a “managed service”
• They are trying to differentiate themselves by offering exclusive inventory
• They build or license technology to buy exchange inventory.
• Pricing is typically CPM, CPC or CPA
• Client base – agencies and direct advertisers

It walks like a duck and quacks like a duck.

So, it must be a duck right? Sort of, except that the duck with a DSP tattoo on its chest is a rocketship!
The common theme here is that both are in the business of delivering outcomes to their customers.  It is just that the inventory situation (supply side) has changed dramatically with exchanges and supply side optimizers.  The demand side has not changed all that much!

The Score – 4.5 Pretty much spot on.

What’s Next?

So what’s next for the evolving DSPs?  Emerging media is a likely wave to ride. Mobile, video, and social media perpetually sit somewhere on the slope of enlightenment. Social is probably the most exciting beach-head that DSPs are now wading into.

With DSP technology in-hand advertisers can quickly build a guaranteed fan base for new products, effectively engage and activate that audience, monetize it and then re-engage in a regular cycle. The DSP platforms with their massive reach and instant scale makes social media activation a solid bet.

Agree? Disagree? Have a visceral reaction? Let the fireworks begin.

Working with data partner eXelate, LucidMedia has been included in their Premier Media Partnership (PMP) program, making it easier for media buyers to purchase data along with their ad inventory in the LucidMedia demand-side platform. Our full on-platform data integration allows for our reporting, insights, brand safety and reach to be applied to the data eXelate provides through the platform.

You can get the full story from AdWeek.

LucidMedia announced two strategic personnel milestones last week which will take the company to the next level as a media platform. We hired Natalie Mazer as Vice President of Optimization to maximize the performance of the LucidMedia demand-side platform. We also announced that Paul Rostkowski, formerly Vice President of Sales, has been promoted to Chief Revenue Officer (CRO).

We sat down with them to discuss the future of both LucidMedia and the digital advertising landscape.

LucidMedia: What do you think is the biggest challenge facing the interactive advertising industry?

Natalie:  The fragmentation of audience across media has been challenging for agencies and their clients. Where once direct-from-publisher inventory was sufficient to achieve performance, web audiences have become increasingly diffuse, particularly with the advent of mobile and video advertising. It takes sophisticated technology to be able to reach the right users at the right time and at the right price.

Paul:  The privacy debate continues to be a hot issue for the digital advertising industry.  Media companies need to support our industry groups in their efforts to educate the public. LucidMedia was one of the first DSPs to offer a real-time network opt-out on our homepage.  We work closely with the industry groups like IAB, NAI and Privacy Choice to ensure we are employing the industry’s best practices when it comes to privacy.

LM:  What problem is LucidMedia solving today with its online advertising management platform?

Natalie:  In a competitive economic climate, advertisers are looking to improve efficiency. With universal frequency capping and a powerful optimization engine, the LucidMedia platform produces goal-driven results within budget.

Paul:  Brand safety is a major concern for brand advertisers. Agencies and advertisers come to us for protection that preemptively identifies unsafe impressions and ensures that ads appear only on pages with appropriate content.

LM: You’ve both been involved in start-ups for years. What is your number one tip for entrepreneurs in the technology sector?

Natalie:  Hire a team with complementary skills and the right attitude. It may be tempting to hire all super-stars, but that strategy is expensive and doesn’t guarantee the creation of a functional corporate culture.

Paul:  Focus on getting your product to market and getting revenue in the door when you’re first starting.  The more you have coming in, the better off you’ll be in the long-run.

LM:  Please discuss the recent partnerships LucidMedia has formed and what impact that has had on the business.

Natalie: Getting all the major data providers on-platform has been a huge step for LucidMedia. Our engineering team has been focused on these efforts for some time and now that’s up and running, the potential is enormous.

Paul:  On-platform video and mobile buying is the next frontier for display advertising.  It has been a real growth area for us and our partners, particularly [mobile advertising network] MobClix and [rich media pioneer] Oggi Finogi.

LM:  What is next in advertising business management? How do you see this evolving in the next two to three years?

Paul:  As the big exchanges and agency holding companies choose their partners, there will be another technical revolution. Right now everyone is focused on building out platforms, but soon the push will shift to integrating those solutions. That’s where a company like LucidMedia, with the combined expertise of eight technology-side experts, will excel.

Natalie:  I agree with Paul. White label solutions are becoming the norm. Platforms that exist with purchased technology, but that don’t have the back-end engineering support will experience difficulties when it comes to complex integrations.

LM:  What major trends do you see affecting LucidMedia the most recently?

Paul:  Agency trading desks have been adopting technology like crazy, trying to keep up with DSPs and all the data providers rolling out user interfaces. In some cases, it may be easier to acquire than to build.

Natalie:  There continues to be confusion surrounding RTB and what it means for online advertising.  Everyone bids in real-time now; it’s how the platform decides what to bid that’s the real differentiator.

Protecting the privacy of online users when it comes to digital advertising is fast becoming the hot topic.  Digital advertising associations, privacy watchdog organizations, and even Capitol Hill are all wading deeply into the privacy waters.  With all this change going on around us it is a good time to reiterate LucidMedia’s strong stance on protecting the privacy of online users who receive advertisements through our digital ad management platform.

Early last year the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) began issuing revised guidelines for behavioral advertising.  And the Direct Marketing Association (DMA) and the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) recently launched a new program that calls for labeling online ads that their members serve based on the habits of online consumers.  You can check out AboutAds.info for more information on the new labeling guidelines.  Our Congress has even been exploring online privacy legislation that would set new boundaries for the collection of personal data by online advertisers.

Amidst all this change and heightened awareness, LucidMedia continues to take privacy seriously.  In fact, we were one of the very first demand-side platforms (DSP) to offer a real-time network opt-out on our homepage.  We are working with all of the leading privacy authorities to ensure we are employing the industry’s best practices when it comes to privacy.

When it comes to privacy, LucidMedia does not use any personally identifiable information (PII) and we do not work with partners who do employ PII.  We do not track or target specific or individual users online nor do we acquire data from providers who do track specific or individual users online.  We do not employ regenerating or FLASH tracking cookies.  Any cookie we do place is set to expire at no more than 90 days.  We use anonymous and general demographic data only, acquired through 3rd party providers or interpreted by our patented contextual engine, to improve the overall effectiveness of our campaigns.

You will find our corporate privacy policies available online at lucidmedia.com/legal.

Research back in 2006 by Microsoft Advertising (Atlas Solutions) called The Combined Impact of Search and Display Advertising: Why Advertisers Should Measure Across Channels by Esco Strong highlights an often forgotten performance rule in display advertising. That is, combining display advertising with your search campaigns provides a significant conversion rate lift over using search alone (http://www.atlassolutions.com/news_20060721.aspx). A 22% conversion lift in fact. Advertisers need to reach users across many different channels yet most metrics focus on each channel individually through their own optics and miss out on the proven “halo effect” of cross-channels synergies. This is because cross channel synergy was hard to measure until the advent of the unified buying platform.

The combined lift of using display advertising with search

There are a lot of reasons why these two mediums yield a synergistic effect. First, display has been proven as a strong way to drive brand awareness and recall and drive increased purchase intent. Display helps win users over who may still be sitting on the fence about converting after they search for after they are already interested in your brand. Display has also been shown to drive branded searches which is an early step in driving return as users pass through the sales funnel. Users usually visit your site by clicking on a display ad then they come back through search when they are ready to buy, sign up, download, register, or fill out your survey.

The same goes for video and mobile when it comes to cross-channel marketing online. Platforms that facilitate display combined with video and mobile drive an additional synergy as those very same users view a pre-roll ad on YouTube or catch an iPhone interstitial ad inside their favorite free app. This is one big reason that LucidMedia has worked so hard to unify display with mobile and video as well as leverage search data in our campaigns. Reach and frequency were always the original tenants of traditional marketing and they are translating perfectly to the digital realm.

There are all sorts of DSPs out there now. In fact, another company announced last week that it would be bringing a new DSP to market and there are already half a dozen major players in the space. So when it comes to choosing the right one for your business, how do you make a decision? If the three options below are important to you, you might be interested to know that no one besides LucidMedia has the capacity. And if you’re a current client, you might review this list anyway just to make sure you’re taking full advantage of our features.

Preemptive brand safety

So few DSPs can provide preemptive brand safety that skepticism about the possibility of it is rampant. The fact is that it is possible. In fact, it’s been done, but it requires a DSP with more than a UI and a handful of relationships with aggregators. In fact, it requires a robust, search engine like crawler partnered with proprietary semantic technology that not only identifies the true “about-ness” of every available impression, it also identifies potentially objectionable content. Preemptive brand safety isn’t simple and it isn’t easy and chances are, your DSP doesn’t have it.

Custom data integrations

Every reputable DSP has relationships with the big data suppliers like BlueKai, eXelate and AlmondNet. So do we. For most advertisers, buying data through our platform from one of these suppliers will be sufficient. But one advantage of starting out as a technology company is that we have brilliant engineers on staff. And our brilliant engineers do more than just build new features into our DSP. For large agencies and advertisers, we can also build custom data integrations so you can use your data within our DSP. You worked hard to collect and categorize, now we can help you put it to work.

Impression avails insight in real time

Real-time bidding has proven to be a powerful tool for many advertisers and most DSPs have access to real-time sources. The key to effective real-time bid management though is not only being able to buy in real time, but being able to make decisions about the value of impressions in real time before you buy. So when it comes to using data, either behavioral or contextual, our clients find our graphs of real time inventory availability for those segments exceptionally helpful. By turning different segments on and off, you can see what the impact to impressions, clicks and conversions could be. It’s an incredibly powerful forecasting tool that you just don’t see in other platforms.

These features won’t be important to every advertiser, but with the number of DSPs on the market now, it’s always nice to see what features are out there that your legacy DSP might be missing. Or if you haven’t selected a provider yet, the benefits you could be leaving on the table by continuing exclusively to work with networks or buy inventory directly from publishers. As you can see, a DSP is not just a new variation on an ad network or exchange, it’s a way to manage your display buying more efficiently.

If you’re an advertiser accustomed to purchasing inventory from individual publishers or publishers with groups of sites, working with a network, exchange or DSP is an entirely different ballgame. For one thing, you’ll be looking at information for thousands of sites instead of just one, two or a dozen. So questions like, “What are your site’s demographics?” are unlikely to yield useful information. It’s a new advertising world, one where you can give your preferred audience requirements to the network, exchange or DSP and they’ll deliver impressions to users who meet your requirements wherever they exist online.  This is instead of picking among several sites to see who has the best demographic profile and then hoping those users show up which is the way the direct buys work.  So in this brave new world of aggregated advertising with unlimited reach and scale, what questions should you ask when trying to select the right online advertising platform to manage your media buy so that you get the best return on your ad spend?

Can you apply a universal frequency cap?

If you’re working with a number of different networks simultaneously, it’s possible that your ad may delivered more than the maximum number of times to a single individual browser than is really optimal. Even premium publishers sell their remnant inventory on the exchanges so your ad could turn up for a single user from both sources more times than you would have planned if you’d had a choice. De-duping your media plan has historically been one of the big efficiency killers in display adverting and reach extension programs.  Managing your buy through a unified display advertising platform that allows for a universal frequency cap across all sources can help you reach your conversion goals in the most efficient manner.

What is the cost of the third party data you will be using to create my audience segments?

Unless a company has proprietary audience segments (which some do), they will most likely be purchasing data from a company like BlueKai, eXelate or AlmondNet. This data is not free, whether the company has a comprehensive agreement with one of the data companies that allows for the purchasing of data on platform or not. The cost will be built into the price somewhere and it may be beneficial to determine the cost of that data compared to a contextual system that targets specific keywords and key phrases or to a direct from publisher model that allows you to target certain sites or certain pages of sites.

Is the targeting used broad or narrow, optimized or fixed?

The direct buys were frequently limited in how much scale they could bring to the table.  You bought a site or a network of sites and your ads ran there, usually within a channel or two as a rudimentary form of “targeting”.  The new breed of aggregated campaigns can run as wide as the web so you need to stop and think about the approach, audience, content and scope of your campaign.  Do you want to reach a specific demographic trait like the lucrative A18 to 49?  Or is it more detailed like “Moms with Kids”?  Or do you want to run on certain kinds of content like golf equipment or hybrid SUVs?  These are fixed-type campaigns with a specific segment to reach.  Do you want to limit your campaign to only those requirements or do you want to run wider to make some serendipitous performance discoveries?  Running wide will often expose whole new pockets that perform for your brand.  We often see with our learning impressions that there are great performing segments, in audience and content and behavior, that can be exploited online to exceed goals.  These kinds of optimized campaigns run a parallel stream of wide learning media using an optimizer to maximize the learnings.  Then use your platform to scale the learnings to hit that perfect balance of pacing, price and performance.

The new frontier in advertising means asking a whole new breed of questions on how your buy will be put together. To ensure that you are getting the most return from your buy, make sure you’re asking the right kind of questions so you’re getting the kind of data you really need to succeed in a real-time world.

Reprinted from iMedia Connection

Overview:

DSPs are really just networks in disguise, they will make networks obsolete, and are a fad with no real staying power.  All false.  In just a few short months, the term demand-side platform (DSP) has become ubiquitous in the online advertising industry. It has become synonymous with all things real-time bid, exchange-sourced, display advertising — in many cases replacing the mainstay term “network” as the model of choice for advertisers. All kinds of media brokers are now scrambling to offer a DSP solution, relegating words like “network” and “optimizer” to the dustbin of display terminology. But as more platforms wade into the opportunity waters, it seems like an equal amount of fog is being injected into industry discussions. So I thought it would be an opportune time to lift some of that fog and expose several of the bigger DSP myths being perpetuated today.

Myth 1: DSPs are really just networks in disguise

False. There are some real differences between DSPs and networks, but recent trends have blurred those lines and given birth to this popular myth. At a fundamental level, traditional networks rely on a large stable of direct publisher relationships to deliver premium placements, easy reach, and ample scale, while owning the media risk and performance responsibilities. Many of these traditional networks live on today amid the DSP wave, successfully delivering campaigns along the way. But networks have begun to rely on exchanges as easy aggregation points for quick scale, and that is what started the move to DSPs. Then when the networks began to layer on automated optimization and advertiser-facing controls alongside their exchange-sourced media — either managed or self-service — they started to look like a lot like DSPs. This is how the whole DSP phenomenon began to accelerate. As networks began to rely heavily on exchange-sourced media while automating the trafficking process and exposing levers and knobs to the advertiser, some essentially became demand-side platforms. With the scale of the real-time bid exchanges and external facing controls, yesterday’s traditional ad network becomes today’s “hot” DSP. But there aren’t going to be as many DSPs as ad networks — read on for why.

Myth 2: DSPs will make networks obsolete

False. It will remain so until all available inventory is transacted on the exchanges. That said, DSPs are creating a “sofa bed” problem (neither a sofa, nor a bed) in the network business. At one end are networks — and publishers in some cases — delivering high-value inventory perhaps with custom or innovative creative. At the other end is the pure performance network that shoulders the media risk and runs cost-per-action performance campaigns. In this scenario, the exchanges are a fabulous source of cheap inventory for the performance networks. In the middle of this are the networks with a rapidly eroding publisher base. It is these networks that are in the greatest danger of obsolescence.

Myth 3: Using a DSP means you get brand-safe campaigns

False. It seems like brand safety is being treated like transparency in our industry. Everyone offers it in one form or another, but like transparency, brand safety means different things to different organizations. Just like transparency, everyone defines brand safety differently. There is one thing that separates effective brand safety from all the other forms of impression analysis and delivery verification out there today: preemptive filtering. Is your flavor of brand safety truly preemptive? Or is the “brand safety” you are getting really just post-impression analysis? Is it reactive?

Automatic brand safety is another of the industry myths perpetuated by networks rushing a DSP to market. Real brand safety, meaning a demonstrably safe environment for a brand advertiser to promote its message online, comes from truly preemptive brand safe filtering. But in practice, pre-impression analysis for relevance and safety is difficult to do. Evaluating a billion impressions a day for applicability takes a robust platform and intelligent integration with all of the real-time sources – and this requires investment in technology and people to do it right. But preemptive filtering pays huge dividends in efficiency and thus returns. With truly preemptive brand safety, you only buy what is safe and there is no waste. No wasted targeting, optimization, time, or ad-spend.

Myth 4: There are dozens of DSPs today, and there will soon be hundreds more

False. There is no shortage of organizations claiming to be a DSP. But you can count on one hand the number of solution providers able to deliver a truly successful DSP campaign (perhaps even minus a couple of fingers). In the heyday of networks, there were reportedly more than 300 ad networks out there, but few had a significant amount of their own proprietary technology. It is the large, technology-rich networks that have successfully transitioned to become real DSPs. The rest are scrambling to rely on relationships for their technology, as they had little or no technology of their own to expose when the DSP tsunami hit our industry’s shores. Because of the technology required, there will be far fewer successful DSPs than there were ad networks. Dozens? Maybe somewhere down the line. Hundreds? No way.

Myth 5: DSPs are a fad and will not have real staying power

False. Far from a fad, the DSP trend is about control, efficiency, and profitability. Advertisers never wanted to outsource all of their control; they did it for the quick scale and reach that networks provided. Now that the exchanges have matured and have exposed real-time bid APIs, control can move back to the advertisers, while retaining all of the scale and reach that networks can offer. Once we go down this road, there will be no turning back. The DSP trend is causing a fundamental change in the nature of how display media is used.

With any significant new trend, there is bound to be some confusion. Hopefully this clears the air around some of the more prevalent myths in our industry. There are sure to be more myths and many different viewpoints, but this is a start. What is certain is that the trend toward the self-service DSP model is going to have some staying power. It has already made an irrevocable impact on how display media is brokered and continues to drive upheaval. It was way back in 475 BC that the Greek philosopher Heraclitus said, “The only constant in life is change,” and those words are just as true today. The display advertising industry has gone through constant change since Hotwired ran the first banner ad in 1993, and the nimble organizations will be the ones that continue to flourish.